Oregon residents go to hospitals in order to be diagnosed and treated for whatever ails them. Most people do not think that, in doing so, they will end up the victim of a serious medical error that could cost them their lives. Even so, medical malpractice is the third leading cause of death here in the United States.
In many cases, plastic surgery is what is referred to as an elective surgery, performed to augment, enhance or somehow improve a patient's facial features or body parts. However, just because in many cases the procedures are not medically necessary, that does not mean that a surgeon here in Oregon or elsewhere should feel free to deceive his or patients by knowingly using substandard products that could potentially seriously injury or kill the patient. Doing would likely constitute medical malpractice.
It is most likely safe to say that no one in Oregon expects to go see a doctor and end up in worse shape than when he or she sought medical assistance. Sadly, this happens more often than people are willing to admit. In fact, estimates indicate that only around 2.9 percent of people who are victims of medical malpractice seek compensation through the court system.
Approximately 34 percent of all claims filed against doctors are for mistakes made during surgeries. Estimates indicate that errors occur once in every 10,000 procedures. Oregon readers might find it interesting that medical malpractice suits filed due to surgical errors cite mistakes such as operating on the wrong part of the body, leaving surgical materials in the patient and burns patients receive from surgical fires.
Think of the last time you went to the hospital, or even the last time you went to see your doctor at a private clinic. How confident did you feel about the way things were being done?
One statistic indicates that as many as 90 percent of the country's radiologists will be the subject of at least one lawsuit by the time they reach the age of 65. Radiology ranks number eight among the medical professions that are likely to be implicated in a medical malpractice claim. This means that if an Oregon patient files such a claim, a radiologist could be part of it.
There are pros and cons of nearly every electronic system. While an electronic record keeping system might work beautifully in an office for an administrator making the decision whether to purchase it, that same ease of use might disappear in a fast-paced emergency room. Many who work in this environment routinely would most likely qualify it as controlled chaos, which means that medical negligence is always possible. It appears that the new computer systems installed in emergency rooms across the country and here in Oregon could be disrupting the delicate balance needed for ERs to function properly.
Oregon residents entrust the care of their family members to medical facilities and their personnel on a daily basis. If their loved one dies while under the care ofsuch a facility, it can raise numerous questions. If those questions are not satisfactorily answered, it could be because medical malpractice is the cause.
Many medical malpractice cases filed around the country, including many in Oregon, never make it to trial. The parties will often reach a settlement before that happens, which can save all of the parties involved the time and expense of a trial. Furthermore, one or more of the parties involved in a medical malpractice case might not want the case to go to trial because there would be no guaranteed outcome as there is with a settlement.
Most people underestimate the importance of their feet until or unless they are unable to use them. Without feet, mobility is difficult. When Oregon residents have issues with their feet, they expect doctors to make the correct diagnosis and prescribe an appropriate course of treatment to fix the problem. If that does not happen, and the patient is left with a permanent disability, medical negligence could be the reason.